Drinking Buddies: Atrial Fibrillation and Its Cardiometabolic Companions


Medical Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider regarding diagnosis, treatment options, and personal health decisions. If you experience chest pain, shortness of breath, or other emergency symptoms, seek immediate medical attention.

Case Presentation

Patient A: The Silent Stroke

A 58-year-old woman with obesity (BMI 34), treated obstructive sleep apnea, and borderline diabetes presents to her cardiologist after experiencing "fluttering" in her chest during a stressful week at work. By the time she arrives for her appointment three days later, she feels completely fine. Her ECG in the office shows normal sinus rhythm. Her doctor reassures her: "Your heart looks fine today. It was probably just stress. Let's check back in a few months."

Six months later, she wakes up unable to move her right arm. Her husband finds her slurring her words and calls 911. In the emergency room, she is found to be in atrial fibrillation — and CT imaging reveals a large left middle cerebral artery stroke. Despite receiving thrombolytics within the treatment window, she is left with permanent right-sided weakness and difficulty speaking.

Her neurologist explains: "The AFib caused a blood clot to form in your heart. That clot traveled to your brain."

She had likely been in and out of AFib for months — perhaps years — and nobody knew. She was never anticoagulated. The fluttering she felt six months ago? That was her warning. It went unheeded.

Her stroke was preventable.

Patient B: The Snorer and His Sleep Apnea

A 52-year-old man with a history of snoring "loud enough to wake the neighbors," daytime fatigue, and a neck circumference of 18 inches presents after his wife noticed he "stopped breathing" multiple times while sleeping. He denies any cardiac symptoms. His ECG is normal. A sleep study reveals severe obstructive sleep apnea with an AHI of 48.

He is started on CPAP therapy. During a routine follow-up visit two years later, an Apple Watch alerts him to an "irregular rhythm." A subsequent Holter monitor reveals paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurring primarily during sleep — episodes he never felt. His cardiologist explains that his untreated OSA likely contributed to the development of AFib, and that his CPAP compliance will be critical for any chance of rhythm control.

He asks: "You mean my snoring caused a heart problem?"

In a way, yes.

Patient C: The Elite Athlete

A 48-year-old competitive cyclist and marathon runner presents with palpitations that started during a training ride. He has completed over 30 marathons and multiple Ironman triathlons over 25 years. His resting heart rate is 42 bpm. He has no traditional cardiovascular risk factors — his cholesterol is "perfect," he doesn't smoke, and he maintains a strict plant-based diet. He says: "I'm the healthiest person I know. This can't be a heart problem."

An echocardiogram reveals a dilated left atrium. A 14-day Zio monitor captures multiple episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. His electrophysiologist explains that his decades of extreme endurance training have likely caused structural remodeling of his heart — and that elite athletes actually have a 5-fold or higher increased risk of AFib compared to the general population.

All that training, and his heart is paying the price.

Flying Under the Radar

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, affecting an estimated 6 million Americans — a number projected to double by 2050. Yet for all its prevalence, AFib is remarkably adept at hiding in plain sight. (See the 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for AFib)

Why is AFib so hard to catch?

The answer lies in its nature. AFib can be:

  • Paroxysmal — coming and going unpredictably, lasting minutes to hours, then spontaneously converting to normal rhythm
  • Asymptomatic — many patients, particularly those with obesity and sleep apnea, have blunted symptom perception
  • Nocturnal — often occurring during sleep when no one is watching (except perhaps a smartwatch)
  • Episodic — absent during the very office visit or ECG that was ordered to evaluate it

A single 12-lead ECG captures roughly 10 seconds of cardiac activity. A 24-hour Holter monitor — the traditional "gold standard" — still misses the majority of paroxysmal AFib episodes. Extended monitoring (7-30 days) and implantable loop recorders have dramatically improved detection, but they require clinicians to suspect AFib in the first place.

The problem: If AFib doesn't show up on the test, it doesn't get diagnosed. And if the patient "feels fine" — which many do between episodes — there's no urgency to look harder.

The Most Feared Complication: Stroke

AFib isn't just an annoyance of palpitations and fatigue. Its most devastating consequence is stroke — and specifically, cardioembolic stroke, which tends to be larger, more disabling, and more deadly than other stroke types.

The statistics are sobering:

  • AFib increases stroke risk 5-fold
  • Stroke is the leading cause of permanent disability in developed countries
  • AFib-related strokes account for 15-20% of all ischemic strokes
  • One in four strokes in patients over 80 is attributable to AFib
  • Many patients discover they have AFib only after their stroke — when it's too late for primary prevention

The mechanism is straightforward but lethal: when the atria fibrillate rather than contract effectively, blood pools in the left atrial appendage (LAA). This stagnant blood forms clots. When a clot dislodges, it travels directly to the brain — causing a "brain attack."

For more on this topic, see our CardioAdvocate phenotype: "Brain Attack: How Recognizing Heart Disease May Save Your Brain."

This is why anticoagulation is so critical in AFib — and why detecting AFib before a stroke occurs can be life-saving.

The Cardiometabolic Web

AFib does not exist in isolation. It travels with company — a constellation of cardiometabolic conditions that both cause AFib and are worsened by it:

These conditions cluster. They feed each other. And they all converge on the left atrium.

AFib and OSA: Drinking Buddies

If cardiometabolic diseases were a group of friends at a bar, AFib and OSA would be sitting together in the corner booth, enabling each other's bad habits.

The relationship is bidirectional and profound:

  • OSA prevalence in AFib patients: 50-80%
  • AFib prevalence in severe OSA: Up to 4x higher than the general population
  • Recurrence of AFib after cardioversion or ablation: Dramatically higher in untreated OSA (See SLEEP-AF Study)

OSA creates the conditions for AFib through multiple mechanisms:

  • Intermittent hypoxia triggers oxidative stress and atrial fibrosis
  • Negative intrathoracic pressure during obstructed breaths stretches the atria
  • Autonomic nervous system dysfunction promotes arrhythmia triggers
  • Systemic inflammation accelerates atrial remodeling

And yet — despite this overwhelming evidence — OSA remains vastly underdiagnosed in the AFib population. Patients are treated with anticoagulants, rate-control medications, and expensive ablation procedures while the underlying OSA goes unaddressed.

It's like treating someone for recurrent pneumonia while ignoring their chronic aspiration.

The Other Drinking Buddy: Alcohol

Given the title of this article, we'd be remiss not to discuss the actual drinking buddy: alcohol. The relationship between alcohol and AFib is well-established and clinically important.

"Holiday Heart Syndrome" — a term coined in 1978 — describes the acute onset of AFib following binge drinking, typically 12-36 hours after cessation. But the relationship goes beyond weekend binges. A comprehensive JACC review on Alcohol and Atrial Fibrillation revealed sobering data:

  • For each additional alcoholic drink per day, AFib incidence increases 8%
  • Even one drink in the preceding 4 hours is associated with 2-fold higher odds of an AFib episode
  • Two or more drinks: 3-fold higher odds of triggering AFib
  • Heavy habitual alcohol consumption is a more important risk factor than obesity or hypertension for AFib

Alcohol triggers AFib through multiple mechanisms: direct toxic effects on atrial myocytes, autonomic dysfunction, electrolyte disturbances, and activation of stress kinases that promote arrhythmogenicity.

The clinical implication is clear: for patients with AFib — or those at risk — alcohol reduction or abstinence should be part of the treatment plan. This isn't just about avoiding binge drinking; even moderate daily consumption increases risk.

The Endurance Athlete Paradox

Perhaps the cruelest irony in AFib epidemiology: the individuals who dedicate their lives to cardiovascular fitness may be placing themselves at significantly increased risk of the very arrhythmia they're trying to prevent.

The data are striking. A meta-analysis of endurance athletes found a 5-fold increased risk of developing AFib among older endurance athletes compared to non-athletes. Some studies report prevalence up to 10 times higher in elite athletes engaged in long-term endurance training.

Key findings from the research:

  • Cross-country skiers: A landmark study of 52,755 Swedish skiers found that faster finishing times and more races completed correlated with higher AFib risk
  • Long-term prevalence: After 28-30 years of follow-up, 12.8% of high-performance endurance athletes had "lone AFib"
  • Cyclists vs. Golfers: Former professional cyclists had a 10% prevalence of AFib vs. 0% in golfers who never did endurance training
  • Dose-response: A JACC Clinical Electrophysiology study found athletes with >2,000 cumulative hours of high-intensity exercise had nearly 4-fold increased AFib risk (OR 3.88)
  • The U-shaped curve: Moderate exercise is protective, but extreme endurance training tips the scales the other way

The Mechanism: "Athletic Heart" Remodeling

Years of extreme endurance training leads to structural and electrical remodeling that creates an AFib substrate:

  • Chronic volume loading: The heart adapts to accommodate high cardiac output demands, leading to chamber enlargement — particularly the left atrium
  • Atrial fibrosis and scarring: Repeated bouts of intense exercise cause micro-injury and inflammation; over time, this results in fibrotic tissue that disrupts normal electrical conduction
  • Vagal enhancement: The bradycardia of the "athlete's heart" reflects increased parasympathetic tone, which paradoxically can promote AFib through shortened atrial refractory periods
  • Repetitive inflammation: Even a single mountain marathon causes transient spikes in cardiac biomarkers and slowed atrial conduction — multiply this over decades

The "Healthy Athlete Bias"

Ironically, these fit individuals often fall through the cracks of the healthcare system. They and their clinicians place too much emphasis on "modifiable risk factors" — diet, exercise, smoking — while disproportionately ignoring non-modifiable risk factors like genetics and, importantly, the structural consequences of extreme training itself. As we discuss in our phenotype "Killer Workouts: The Adult Athlete," healthy-appearing athletes get less attention from the healthcare system — not more.

Notably, this increased risk appears predominantly in men. Female endurance athletes do not show the same elevated AFib risk — possibly due to cardioprotective effects of estrogen that stabilize heart adaptations.

CardioAdvocate Checklist

If you have AFib — or suspect you might:

Screen for the "Drinking Buddies":
Have you been screened for obstructive sleep apnea? Do you snore loudly? Do you wake up tired despite sleeping 7+ hours? Has anyone witnessed you stop breathing during sleep? What is your neck circumference? (>17" men, >16" women = higher risk). Consider: STOP-BANG questionnaire, home sleep study, or polysomnography
What is your alcohol intake? Even moderate daily drinking increases AFib risk. Binge drinking can trigger acute AFib episodes ("Holiday Heart")
What is your BMI and waist circumference? BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² significantly increases AFib risk and recurrence. Visceral adiposity (waist circumference) may matter more than total weight
Are you an endurance athlete? >2,000 cumulative hours of high-intensity endurance training increases AFib risk. Long-term marathon, cycling, cross-country skiing, triathlon participation
Have you been evaluated for HFpEF, CKD, hypertension, diabetes? All cluster with AFib and require comprehensive management
Stroke Prevention:
What is your CHA₂DS₂-VASc score? This determines your annual stroke risk and need for anticoagulation. Score ≥2 in men or ≥3 in women generally warrants anticoagulation
Are you on appropriate anticoagulation? Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over warfarin for most patients. Aspirin alone is NOT adequate stroke prevention in AFib
If you can't tolerate anticoagulation, have you discussed left atrial appendage occlusion? Devices like the Watchman or Amulet can reduce stroke risk without long-term blood thinners
Detecting Cryptic AFib:
If you have "palpitations" but normal ECGs — have you had extended monitoring? Extended ambulatory monitoring (7-14 days): Zio® by iRhythm — FDA-cleared continuous monitoring patch worn up to 14 days. Mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT) — real-time transmission for higher-risk patients. Implantable Loop Recorders (ILRs) for high-suspicion cases: Medtronic LINQ II™ — insertable cardiac monitor with up to 3-year continuous monitoring; Abbott Confirm Rx™ — smartphone-compatible ICM with Bluetooth connectivity
Do you use a smartwatch or wearable device? Irregular rhythm notifications should prompt medical evaluation — not diagnostic, but can guide when to seek extended monitoring
Have you had an echocardiogram? Left atrial size is a marker of AFib substrate. Dilated LA (≥4.0 cm or indexed >34 mL/m²) suggests higher AFib burden

Questions to Ask Your Clinician:

  • "Should I be screened for sleep apnea?"
  • "How much alcohol is safe for me to drink?"
  • "Given my endurance training history, am I at higher risk for AFib?"
  • "How will you monitor me for AFib if my ECG is normal today?"
  • "What is my stroke risk and do I need blood thinners?"
  • "If I can't take blood thinners, is a Watchman device an option for me?"
  • "If I lose weight and address my risk factors, can I reduce my AFib burden?"
  • "Should I be asking about ablation?"

Deep Dive

The Case for Early Ablation

For decades, catheter ablation was reserved as a "last resort" for AFib — something to consider after medications failed and the arrhythmia became unbearable. But a growing body of evidence suggests we've had it backwards. Earlier referral for ablation may actually improve long-term outcomes.

The rationale is straightforward: AFib begets AFib. The longer the atria spend in fibrillation, the more remodeling occurs — electrical, structural, and fibrotic changes that make the arrhythmia increasingly difficult to treat. Left atrial dilation progresses. Fibrosis accumulates. The substrate becomes more entrenched.

The EAST-AFNET 4 Trial

The EAST-AFNET 4 Trial (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) fundamentally changed our understanding of rhythm control timing. This landmark study randomized over 2,700 patients with early AFib (diagnosed within 12 months) to either early rhythm control or usual care.

Key findings:

  • Early rhythm control reduced the composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization by 21%
  • The benefit was consistent across subgroups, including those with heart failure
  • Earlier intervention — within the first year of diagnosis — was associated with better outcomes than delaying rhythm control

The 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for AFib now reflects this evidence, emphasizing early rhythm control as a Class I recommendation for suitable patients. The guidelines specifically note that catheter ablation is reasonable as first-line rhythm control therapy for selected patients who prefer this approach.

Why does timing matter?

  • Less remodeling: Early intervention may prevent or slow the progression of atrial structural changes
  • Less fibrosis: Fibrotic substrate is harder to ablate and associated with higher recurrence rates
  • Higher success rates: Ablation performed earlier in the disease course — particularly for paroxysmal rather than persistent AFib — has better long-term freedom from recurrence
  • Potential disease modification: Rather than just symptom control, early ablation may actually alter the natural history of AFib progression
The clinical implication: If you have newly diagnosed AFib and are a candidate for ablation, don't wait until you've "failed" multiple medications. The conversation about ablation should happen early — not as a last resort.

2026 Update — AF + HFpEF: Pulsed Field Ablation Emerges

The intersection of atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents one of the most challenging scenarios in cardiovascular medicine. These conditions share bidirectional causality: AFib worsens diastolic function through loss of atrial kick and rapid ventricular rates, while HFpEF promotes AFib through elevated filling pressures and left atrial stretch. Breaking this vicious cycle has proven difficult.

Enter pulsed field ablation (PFA) — a novel non-thermal ablation technology that uses high-voltage electrical fields to create tissue-selective lesions. Unlike traditional radiofrequency or cryoablation, PFA preferentially affects cardiac myocytes while sparing surrounding structures like the esophagus, phrenic nerve, and pulmonary veins. This selectivity is particularly appealing in the HFpEF population, where preserving atrial compliance and function is critical.

The CABA-HFpEF-DZHK27 trial is now underway — a randomized controlled trial comparing catheter ablation to usual care specifically in patients with AF and HFpEF. Early mechanistic data suggest that PFA may offer unique advantages in this population by preserving atrial mechanical function better than thermal ablation techniques.

Self-advocacy question: "I have both AFib and HFpEF — should I be asking about ablation, and specifically about newer ablation technologies like pulsed field ablation?"

The LEGACY Trial: Proof That Weight Loss Works

For years, the relationship between obesity and AFib was observational — we knew they traveled together, but could weight loss actually reduce AFib burden?

The LEGACY trial (Long-Term Effect of Goal-directed weight management in an Atrial fibrillation Cohort), published in JACC 2015 by Pathak, Middeldorp, and colleagues from the University of Adelaide, provided the answer.

Study Design: 355 patients with AFib and BMI ≥ 27 kg/m². Enrolled in a structured weight management program. Followed for approximately 5 years. AFib burden assessed by 7-day Holter monitoring annually.

Key Findings:

Patients were categorized by weight loss achieved:

  • ≥10% weight loss: 6-fold greater likelihood of AFib-free survival — Significant reduction in AFib symptom burden and severity. Many achieved freedom from AFib without antiarrhythmic drugs or ablation
  • 3-9% weight loss: Modest improvement in AFib outcomes
  • <3% weight loss: No significant improvement

The dose-response relationship was striking: the more weight lost, the greater the benefit. And importantly — weight fluctuation (yo-yo dieting) was associated with worse outcomes, suggesting that sustained weight management is critical.

The Mechanism: "Sick Fat" and Pericardial Adiposity

Why does weight loss reduce AFib burden? The answer lies not just in losing weight, but in losing the right kind of fat — specifically, visceral adipose tissue, and most importantly, pericardial and epicardial fat that directly contacts the heart.

Visceral fat — particularly the fat surrounding the heart — is not merely passive storage tissue. It is metabolically active and, when pathologically expanded, becomes what Harold Bays MD and the National Lipid Association have termed "adiposopathy" or "sick fat." This dysfunctional adipose tissue:

  • Secretes pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) that promote atrial inflammation and fibrosis
  • Infiltrates the atrial myocardium directly — epicardial fat literally touches the left atrial wall with no fascial barrier
  • Promotes oxidative stress and electrical remodeling that creates an arrhythmogenic substrate
  • Correlates with the "Atherogenic Triad" (high triglycerides, low HDL-C, elevated small dense LDL particles) — another manifestation of metabolic dysfunction

The Framingham Heart Study demonstrated that pericardial fat volume is independently associated with prevalent AFib, even after adjusting for BMI. It's not about being heavy — it's about where the fat lives and how it behaves.

Weight loss — particularly through structured programs that reduce visceral adiposity — shrinks this "sick fat," reduces the inflammatory milieu surrounding the atria, and allows reverse remodeling. This explains why sustained weight loss can produce such dramatic improvements in AFib burden.

For more on these concepts, see our CardioAdvocate phenotypes: "Atherogenic Triad" and "Visceral Adiposopathy."

The CARDIO-FIT Study: Exercise Adds to the Benefit

The same Adelaide research group followed LEGACY with the CARDIO-FIT study (JACC 2015), examining whether cardiorespiratory fitness independently affects AFib outcomes.

Key Findings:

  • Patients who improved their cardiorespiratory fitness by ≥2 METs had significantly better AFib outcomes
  • Fitness improvement was associated with reduced AFib burden independent of weight loss
  • Cardiorespiratory fitness gain provides a 12% incremental gain over weight-loss alone in AFib-free survival
  • Combined weight loss AND fitness improvement produced the greatest benefit

The Clinical Implication

Weight loss and exercise are not interchangeable — they provide additive benefit. A patient who loses weight but remains sedentary does not achieve the full potential benefit. Similarly, a patient who exercises vigorously but maintains obesity still carries excess AFib risk.

The optimal approach: sustained weight loss combined with improved cardiorespiratory fitness.

Important distinction: The exercise that benefits AFib patients in CARDIO-FIT is moderate exercise that improves fitness — not the extreme endurance training that causes AFib in athletes. The relationship between exercise and AFib follows a U-shaped curve.

Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

For most patients with AFib and elevated stroke risk, anticoagulation is the cornerstone of stroke prevention. But what about patients who can't tolerate blood thinners?

Some patients find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place:

  • High stroke risk from AFib (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2)
  • High bleeding risk that makes long-term anticoagulation dangerous (prior intracranial hemorrhage, recurrent GI bleeding, falls risk, etc.)

For these patients, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) offers an alternative. Because over 90% of AFib-related clots form in the left atrial appendage, mechanically closing off this structure can dramatically reduce stroke risk without requiring lifelong anticoagulation.

Available devices include:

  • Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific) — the most widely implanted LAAO device, with extensive clinical trial data
  • Amulet (Abbott) — a newer device with a dual-seal design

Who is a candidate for LAAO?

  • Patients with non-valvular AFib and elevated stroke risk
  • Contraindication or intolerance to long-term anticoagulation
  • High bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score ≥3)
  • Patient preference to avoid lifelong blood thinners

The PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials demonstrated that Watchman was non-inferior to warfarin for stroke prevention, with lower rates of major bleeding over time. Long-term follow-up shows sustained benefit.

LAAO is not a first-line therapy — anticoagulation remains the standard of care for most patients. But for those truly caught between bleeding and stroke risk, LAAO can be a life-saving option.

OSA Treatment and AFib: The CPAP Question

Multiple studies suggest that CPAP therapy for OSA reduces AFib recurrence after cardioversion and ablation. The SLEEP-AF Study (JACC 2022) demonstrated that CPAP therapy results in actual reversal of atrial remodeling:

  • Patients with OSA who are compliant with CPAP have significantly lower AFib recurrence after ablation
  • Non-compliant CPAP users have outcomes similar to untreated OSA patients
  • The benefit requires actual use of the therapy — owning a CPAP machine that sits in the closet doesn't count

This has implications for AFib management: screening for OSA, initiating treatment, and ensuring compliance should be part of comprehensive AFib care.

Treating the Substrate, Not Just the Rhythm

The traditional approach to AFib focuses on:

  1. Rate control (slowing the heart rate during AFib)
  2. Rhythm control (cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation)
  3. Anticoagulation (preventing stroke)

What's missing? Substrate modification — addressing the underlying conditions that create and perpetuate the arrhythmia.

The LEGACY and CARDIO-FIT trials, along with growing evidence around OSA treatment, suggest that aggressive management of cardiometabolic risk factors should be a first-line therapy for AFib — not an afterthought. The 2023 ACC/AHA AFib Guidelines now emphasize this strongly.

Consider the patient who undergoes an expensive catheter ablation for AFib but continues to have untreated severe OSA and persistent obesity. The recurrence rate? Unacceptably high. The ablation may have "worked" technically, but the substrate that created AFib in the first place remains.

The Bottom Line

Atrial fibrillation is not just an electrical problem — it's a cardiometabolic disease. And its most feared complication — stroke — is preventable.

Catching AFib requires vigilance, because it hides. It comes and goes. It happens during sleep. It doesn't always announce itself with dramatic palpitations. And sometimes, the first sign is a devastating stroke.

Managing AFib requires more than pills and procedures. It requires addressing the drinking buddies: obesity, sleep apnea, actual alcohol, and — paradoxically — even extreme exercise.

The "sick fat" surrounding your heart matters. The sleep apnea stretching your atria matters. The alcohol triggering Holiday Heart matters. And for endurance athletes, the structural remodeling from decades of training matters too.

The LEGACY trial taught us that sustained weight loss can produce 6-fold improvements in AFib-free survival. The CARDIO-FIT study showed that fitness matters independently. And the overwhelming evidence linking OSA and alcohol to AFib demands that we screen, counsel, treat, and ensure compliance.

For stroke prevention, anticoagulation saves lives. And for those who can't tolerate blood thinners, left atrial appendage occlusion offers a way out of the rock-and-hard-place dilemma.

If you have AFib — or if you have the risk factors that predict it — advocate for comprehensive evaluation. Ask about sleep apnea. Understand your metabolic health. Know your stroke risk. Recognize that the path to better AFib control may run through the gym and the sleep lab, not just the cath lab.

Your heart is listening to your whole body. Make sure someone is listening to your heart.

CardioAdvocate helps people understand what matters — and how to speak up about it.

References & Resources

Guidelines

Landmark Trials — Rhythm Control & Ablation

AF + HFpEF and Pulsed Field Ablation (2026 Update)

Landmark Trials — Weight Loss & Fitness

OSA and AFib

Visceral Adiposity and Pericardial Fat

Alcohol and AFib

Endurance Athletes and AFib

Stroke Prevention and LAAO

Screening Tools

Cardiac Monitoring Devices

Related CardioAdvocate Content

Disclaimer: This article is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare providers with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking treatment because of information in this article. CardioAdvocate.com does not endorse any specific treatment, medication, or procedure mentioned herein. Readers are responsible for independently verifying all information and consulting with appropriate healthcare professionals before making any medical decisions.

Content on CardioAdvocate.com is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. No physician–patient relationship is created. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional for medical concerns.

Previous
Previous

The “Day Dreamer” - Sleep Apnea

Next
Next

The Enigma of HFpEF